Dear colleagues, A blog "between apu & me" entitled "My Absentee Ballot" (13 July 2006, at http://www.beautiful-people.org/betweenAPUnMe/?p=58) lists an Absentee Ballot submitted to the APU Alumni Association. According to the ballot: A: Selection of New Executives Disagree B: Activities, Financial and Audit Report for FY 2005 Disagree C: Proposed Activities and Budget for FY 2006 Disagree D: Changes in Regulations for the APU Student & Alumni Association Disagree Moreover, concrete reasons for each option are given, which serve to underline the high quality of foreign students at APU. For instance, the decision to oppose the selection of new executives (question A) is articulated as follows. The selection does not meet the two basic principles of free elections - freedom of active participation and freedom of passive participation. The blog continues: "Freedom of active participation refers to the idea that all citizens (in this case alumni) can put themselves forward to be candidates. In the case of the APU Alumni Association, the nomination of the excecutives is done in secret and nobody knows why the people who are on the list are on the list. Freedom of passive participation refers to the fact that all alumni can ELECT the executives. In this case, there is nothing to elect. There is a ready-made committee and you can only agree or disagree". In the system designed to elect the next President of Ritsumeikan, the freedom of active participation does not exist. Moreover, since the system is based on an indirect election in which members of a selection committee are elected without having to clarify who they will vote for, it cannot be said that the freedom of passive participation exists either. This is perhaps only natural, since the system to elect the President was designed out of a fear of the inability to control or predict the results of a "free" election. ------------------------------------------ Editor: Toru Tsujishita ( College of Science and Engineering, Professor ) Japanese version sent to 3887 faculty members and staffs, archived in http://ac-net.org/rtm/No/90, this partial translation sent to 406 faculty members, archived in http://ac-net.org/rtm/No/92.